Human rights lawyer Inibehe Effiong has expressed his strong condemnation of the threats made against National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) member Ushe ‘Raye’ Uguamaye following her critical comments about President Bola Tinubu. Uguamaye faced significant backlash after describing Tinubu as a “terrible president,” leading to intimidation and harassment from various quarters.
Effiong’s comments come in response to the alarming situation surrounding Uguamaye, who has become a focal point of controversy due to her outspoken views. He emphasized the importance of maintaining the rule of law in Nigeria, questioning the legality of the threats directed at her. In an interview with Channels TV, Effiong articulated that even if a corps member were found to have breached NYSC regulations, the appropriate response would be a minor extension of their service, rather than resorting to threats or intimidation.
Addressing the public outrage over Uguamaye’s statements, Effiong remarked, “If somebody says Tinubu is a terrible president, is that not a statement of fact for which millions of Nigerians are in agreement?” His assertion highlights the widespread sentiment among many citizens who feel disillusioned with the current administration.
Effiong further stressed that such threats not only infringe on individual rights but also jeopardize the integrity of the nation as a whole. He criticized those who have targeted Uguamaye, stating, “The woman who called to threaten her—we will have to look at that, the legality of that, and the possible legal consequences for that. We cannot accept for Nigeria to be a Banana Republic.” This statement underscores his commitment to ensuring accountability and legal recourse for individuals who engage in intimidation.
Moreover, Effiong insisted that open criticism, even when directed at the highest offices in the land, should be protected and defended as a fundamental aspect of a healthy democracy. He called for a society where citizens can express their opinions without fear of retribution, emphasizing that such freedoms are essential for the progress and development of the nation.
As the situation unfolds, Effiong’s stance serves as a reminder of the critical need for legal protections for individuals who dare to voice dissenting opinions, reinforcing the idea that democracy thrives on the ability to challenge authority without facing threats or intimidation.
