The League of Northern Democrats (LND), chaired by former Kano State Governor Ibrahim Shekarau, has expressed strong opposition to Nigeria’s potential return to a parliamentary system of government. Instead, the LND advocates for the continued use of the presidential system, which they believe better serves the nation’s diverse needs. This stance was articulated in a paper presented by Shekarau during the National Dialogue on a Home-Grown Parliamentary System held in Abuja.
In his presentation, Shekarau emphasized that the presidential system requires leaders to seek a broad electoral mandate. This necessity encourages candidates to appeal to a wider audience, thereby fostering national unity. He argued that this approach compels political leaders to transcend ethnic and regional divides, which is crucial in a country as diverse as Nigeria.
Shekarau contrasted this with the parliamentary model that was adopted at Nigeria’s independence. He pointed out that this model often led to representatives being primarily accountable to local constituencies. As a result, it entrenched narrow regional interests at the national level, a phenomenon he noted was evident during the First Republic. This historical context underlines the risks associated with a parliamentary system in a nation marked by ethnic diversity.
Furthermore, Shekarau highlighted the Federal Character principle inherent in the presidential system. He asserted that this principle ensures broad representation across various ethnic and regional groups, creating a structural safeguard that promotes inclusivity. According to him, this inclusivity is essential for preventing any single group from dominating the political landscape.
Read also: Tinubu to demand ceasefire at Arab-Islamic Summit on Israel-Palestinian conflict
The LND chair also articulated concerns about the implications of returning to a parliamentary system. He warned that such a shift could foster localism and factionalism, as members would likely prioritize representing specific ethnic or regional interests over national priorities. This focus on localized interests could undermine the broader goals of national unity and cohesion.
Shekarau posited that the presidential system encourages coalition-building among diverse groups. This dynamic dilutes the dominance of any one faction, promoting a more balanced political environment. He argued that this inclusive approach has been instrumental in advancing national integration, effectively breaking down divisive barriers that have historically plagued the country.
In conclusion, Shekarau underscored his belief that the presidential system is vital for sustaining unity in Nigeria’s pluralistic society. He contended that the challenges posed by ethnic diversity require a governance structure that encourages collaboration and broad representation. The LND’s position reflects a commitment to maintaining a political framework that fosters inclusivity and national cohesion.
Ultimately, the discussion around Nigeria’s governance system remains critical, as it impacts the nation’s ability to navigate its complex social landscape. The LND’s advocacy for the presidential model highlights the ongoing debate about the most effective way to govern a diverse nation like Nigeria.
